Chinese Cut

Two’s company – Series 2

June 22, 2008 · 2 Comments

Welcome back to the second post of the Two’s Company Series. The cricketers of this week are Luke Wright and Shane Watson.

Luke Wright plays for Sussex and the English cricket team. Shane Watson plays for Queensland and the Australian cricket team.

Both players are limited over specialists. They look quite similar in their athletic build too.

WattoLuke Wright

Both have had their fair share of successes in the micro-mini T20 version of cricket. Luke Wright, especially, shot into prominence during the ICC T20 world cup following his T20 exploits for Sussex. Shane Watson had a great time with Rajasthan Royals in the IPL.

Lets compare their limited over statistics (tables provided below).

Watson averages 34.51 while Wright averages 30.25. Not much of a difference.

Both are all rounders, Watson being the better bowler of the two. Wright has 44 first class wickets to his credit while Watson has 103 first class wickets.

Both can hit the ball to some distance, which is why they form an ideal part of their respective T20 teams.

Both of them haven’t still quite managed to cement their places in their respective national T20 sides.

Shane Watson – Career statistics
Tests ODIs FC List A
Matches 3 65 57 125
Runs scored 81 1,001 3,953 2,771
Batting average 20.25 34.51 47.05 35.07
100s/50s 0/0 0/7 11/19 2/18
Top score 31 79 203* 132
Balls bowled 186 2,593 5,226 4,326
Wickets 2 62 103 101
Bowling average 61.50 34.11 30.15 36.31
5 wickets in innings 0 0 2 0
10 wickets in match 0 n/a 1 n/a
Best bowling 1/25 4/39 6/32 4/39
Catches/stumpings 0/– 15/– 40/– 32/–
Luke Wright – Career statistics
Tests ODIs FC LA
Matches - 5 33 74
Runs scored - 121 1085 885
Batting average - 30.25 30.25 20.11
100s/50s - 0/1 2/6 1/2
Top score - 50 155* 125
Balls bowled - 36 3172 2390
Wickets - 0 44 52
Bowling average - - 40.11 40.03
5 wickets in innings - 0 0 0
10 wickets in match - n/a 0 n/a
Best bowling - -/- 3/33 4/12
Catches/stumpings - 1/- 16/– 20/–

Categories: Cricket
Tagged: , , ,

2 responses so far ↓

Leave a Comment